Req: Couglin, Rocklin, et al, A Lawyer Writes, A Practical Guide to Legal Analysis, 2nd ed., Carolina Academic Press #9781611633979Req: Hall, Sampson, Ohio Legal Research, 2009 ed., Carolina Academic Press #9781594604010Req: Dickerson, The ALWD Citation Manual, 4th ed., Aspen Publishing #9780735589308
Please read the following:
Req: The Board of Student Advisors Harvard Law School, Introduction to Advocacy: Research, Writing and Argument, 7th ed., Foundation Press 9781587784194Req: Couglin, Rocklin, et al, A Lawyer Writes, A Practical Guide to Legal Analysis, 2nd ed., Carolina Academic Press, 9781611633979Req: Dickerson, The ALWD Citation Manual, 4th ed., Aspen Publishing, 9780735589308
Please read:Materials for Appellate Problem posted on Springboard (posted after August 20th)Two versions of the same story: Safford v. Redding (on Springboard - posted after August 20th) After reading both versions, consider the following: Who or what is the focus version one? Who or what is the focus version two? How is the school a sympathetic party? How is the student a sympathetic party? What is the theme (the overarching, seemingly universal plight that the story is about) of each statement of the case? How are the statement of the case for each different? Consider what facts are emphasized or omitted in each version. Which statement of the case did you find more persuasive? Why?