All of us, as part of life's experiences, are constantly on the receiving end of well-intentioned advice, much derived from conventional wisdom and not much more.
Indeed, advice is conveyed in a variety of ways...by proverbs, for example: "To err is human," "Never put off until tomorrow what you can do today," or my least favorite: "Ignorance is bliss."
But one of the most inspiring aspects of our modern world is the surprising way in which new knowledge dispels the conventional wisdom of the past - at the same time that it creates immense opportunities for the future.
Such is the case of an article in this week's issue of The Economist magazine, entitled "Profiting from obscurity: What the ‘long tail' means for the economics of e-commerce." I want to share it with you, because it has that element of surprise, that element of challenging convention, and of opening so many new possibilities.
I quote: "Disruptive technologies, learning curves, tipping points - every so often a trendy new term enters the business lexicon and becomes a staple of business plans, conference speeches and PowerPoint presentations."
("Profiting from Obscurity: What the ‘long tail' means for the economics of e-commerce," The Economist, May 5, 2005)
"The latest example, generating buzz among entrepreneurs, technologists and bloggers, is the idea of the ‘long tail.' The term is not new, having long been used in statistics to refer to a feature of ‘power-law' distributions, such as the frequency with which different words are used in English: there are a few common words that are used a great deal, and a long tail of increasingly obscure words that are used less often."
(The Economist, Ibid)
"But the idea is now in vogue because of its particular relevance to the economics of e-commerce. Its popularity in this context is due to an article* published last year by Chris Anderson...who is the editor-in-chief of Wired, a technology magazine. The article struck a chord: Mr. Anderson is expanding it into a book, and talk of long tails is becoming a venture-capital cliché. ‘Business plans now have to have an obligatory long-tail passage,' he says. So when people invoke the long tail, what do they mean?"
(The Economist, Ibid)
"The short answer is a shift from mass markets to niche markets, as electronic commerce aggregates and makes profitable what were previously unprofitable transactions. Consider book sales, which obey a power-law distribution: there is a small number of very popular books, which sell millions of copies, and then a long tail of less popular books. A real-world shop can only stock so many titles on its shelves, so it generally holds those most likely to sell, at the head of the curve: even the largest bookstore carries only around 130,000 titles."
(The Economist, Ibid)
"But an online store, with no limits on its shelf space, can offer a far wider range and open up new markets further down the long tail. In the case of Amazon, for example, around a third of its sales come from outside its top 130,000 titles."
(The Economist, Ibid)
"Similarly, Rhapsody, a streaming-music service, streams more tracks outside than inside its top 10,000 tunes. Mr. Anderson's point is that the collective demand for obscure items is very large, is growing, and can be aggregated over the internet, so that selling obscure books, music CDs or movies could prove to be just as lucrative as selling hits."
(The Economist, Ibid)
"This has a number of intriguing implications. For one thing, opening up those previously uneconomic niche markets should increase overall demand: as people are better able to explore niches, they are more likely to find things they like, and may well consume more of them. This will then shift some demand, at least, away from hits."
(The Economist, Ibid)
"Indeed, the long tail reveals the hit-driven nature of the entertainment industry to be, in part, a vestige of scarcity. With limited space on store shelves, media providers are traditionally very discriminating about what they release, and use intensive marketing to generate a handful of hits. The shift towards electronic sales and distribution, however - music can already be purchased and downloaded instantly, and movies will be next - means that contract providers can afford to be less discriminating."
(The Economist, Ibid)
"'The long tail says rather than trying to guess what the market wants, put it all out there and you'll find demand you hadn't anticipated,' says Mr. Anderson."
(The Economist, Ibid)
"But how can people find content they want when it is buried far down the tail? Already, a number of mechanisms have emerged, based around user recommendations."
(The Economist, Ibid)
"Perhaps the best known is ‘collaborative filtering,' in which purchase histories are analysed to work out what else is likely to interest the buyer of a particular product (‘Customers who bought this item also bought...,' as Amazon puts it). This approach allows users to navigate from hits that they know they like to more obscure titles further down the tail."
(The Economist, Ibid)
"'You need not just variety, but information about variety,' says Mr. Anderson. ‘A long tail without good filters is just noise.' Many people find even the amount of choice on supermarket shelves overwhelming - in large part because there is so little information on which to base a rational choice."
(The Economist, Ibid)
But a mere 27 flavours of jam is nothing compared with millions of music tracks or thousands of movies, so providing filters to help people find what they want is vital."
(The Economist, Ibid)
"Perhaps the most profound implication of the long tail, however, is its impact on popular culture. As choice expands and people can more easily find niche content that particularly interests them, hits will be less important: so what will people talk about when gathered around the water cooler? In fact, says Mr. Anderson, the idea of a shared popular culture is a relatively recent phenomenon: before radio and television, he notes, countries did not operate in ‘cultural lockstep.' And the notion of shared culture is already in decline, thanks to the rise of cable television and other forms of market fragmentation. The long tail will merely accelerate the effect. There will still be blockbuster movies, albums and books, but there will be fewer of them. The companies that will prosper, says Mr. Anderson, will be ‘those that switch out of lowest-common-denominator mode and figure out how to address niches.'"
(The Economist, Ibid)
"Many successful online businesses, such as Amazon, Rhapsody or the iTunes Music Store, already exploit the effects of the long tail. So too do other internet companies, such as Google (which makes money not just by selling adverts to big firms, but also by placing obscure adverts alongside obscure web pages) and eBay (which aggregates low levels of demand for obscure products to make a huge business). Hence the venture capitalists' enthusiasm for long-tailish business plans - and, now that the term is deemed to be cool, its use and misuse in other spheres. The misuse, says Mr. Anderson, is painful. But it is arguably a sign of success: the ‘long tail' has passed into common parlance."
(The Economist, Ibid)
And with the long tail a part of our business lexicon, other opportunities will come. After all, it was not so long ago that business schools taught us that to do well in business we must capture increasingly larger and more significant market share. Ahead is a world of profit from obscurity; of custom products; and of manufacturing on demand.
Ladies and gentlemen, as newly minted career professionals, as educated people, I urge you to continue to learn and to examine our world.
And, as you continue to move forward, look beyond the present with an open mind and bold imagination. Who knows? You, too, may find that one innovation that will let you profit from obscurity; and if not from obscurity, then from some new insight that creates value for others and thus creates wealth for all.
* "The Long Tail": www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail.html
Remarks Abstract:
"Seismic rumbles of change" are transforming traditional paradigms for research and higher education-to say nothing about the relationships between academia, industry, government and the public. The sources of cataclysmic pressure are many, including competition among universities, shifting demographics and their accompanying shifts in priorities, resource constraints, public/government scrutiny of productivity and accountability in universities, the evolution of a global economy and the innovation ecosystem, and, most recently, the worldwide economic downturn. Like many industries, higher education is on the threshold of major, complex changes that must be directed to optimal outcomes. The University of Akron is innovating through a continuous process that seeks to enhance its relevance, connectivity and productivity.
Relevance: Institutions of higher education generally are place-based, and this means that the competitive and comparative advantages of universities are inextricably linked to the vitality and sustainability of their surrounding communities. Thus, universities must act to optimize their impact upon the regions in which they reside, and would be wise to extend their efforts collaboratively into like regions internationally. The complexities of the 21st Century knowledge and conceptual economy require that every academic discipline be collaboratively engaged with the relevant questions of the day in concert with other disciplines and partners on and off campus. In other words, relevance requires the integrated application of all disciplinary knowledge for the public good.
Connectivity: Connectivity is an extension of relevance and refers to engagement with others by universities in the myriad forms represented by partnerships and collaboration that are not limited by institutional, sector, geographic or disciplinary boundaries. In other words, connectivity means relevant engagement among some combinations of other academic institutions, government, business and industry. This becomes essential as governments become a smaller and smaller financial partner, requiring universities increasingly to generate their own financial revenue opportunities.
Productivity: Finally, higher education must move from measuring "excellence" by exclusion and expense to a set of productivity-based metrics that reflect outcomes and achievements in solving "real-world" problems and in enabling student success.
Universities now are being called upon to explore opportunities that will create innovative educational processes and campus cultures congruent with new realities. This will require a close and deep collaboration between universities and other public- and private- sector organizations, along with a willingness to experiment with new models and new alliances. As we increasingly work with partners accustomed to aggressive delivery schedules and product mixes that rapidly change according to market demands, the core of academic processes will be challenged, and adaptability must become integrated into institutional culture.
As part of his 10th State of the University address, University of Akron President Luis M. Proenza promised to send this letter to the university community to ask that faculty, staff and students to "engage in timely and necessary conversations to bring... about (a mission- and vision-based university organizational structure). He said, "I am sure many lively and constructive ideas will be brought forward, but we must approach this with a sense of urgency because, as I have said before, doing business as usual is not an option."
University of Akron President Luis M. Proenza underscored the successes of the past year and set in motion the process of steering the university toward the future during his 10th State of the University Address. As promised during his 2008 address, Proenza provided a progress report on the formal 10-year strategic plan, which he said "will chart the course to our new destination." As he outlined these plans, Proenza encouraged the audience to think about the origin of the name "Akron," derived from the Greek "akros," meaning "high place," in setting and achieving those goals.
Proenza outlined five strategic goals that will guide the university through the next 10 years and beyond:
Proenza also said that, in addition to budget challenges, an increasingly competitive environment for higher education and universities can't continue to operate with an educational model that is more than 200-years-old. He said he believes that the university must try even harder to be to bring down academic silo walls and build connections--emphasizing UA's relevance, connectivity and productivity.