In his book How to Talk Well, James Bender relates the story of a farmer who grew award-winning corn. Each year he entered his corn in the state fair where it won a blue ribbon. One year, a newspaper reporter interviewed him and learned something interesting about how he grew that corn.
(Bender, James, How to Talk Well, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1994)
The reporter discovered that the farmer shared his seed corn with his neighbors.
(Bender, Ibid)
"How can you afford to share your best seed corn with your neighbors when they are entering corn in competition with yours each year?" the reporter asked.
"Didn't you know?" said the farmer. "The wind picks up pollen from the ripening corn and swirls it from field to field. If my neighbors grow inferior corn, cross-pollination will steadily degrade the quality of my corn. If I am to grow good corn, I must help my neighbors grow good corn."
(Bender, Ibid)
The farmer was very much aware of the connectedness of life. His corn could not improve unless his neighbor's corn also improved.
So it is with life's other dimensions, in which the welfare of each is defined by the welfare of all.
This is not a new concept.
"The common good is a notion that originated over 2,000 years ago in the writings of Plato, Aristotle and Cicero."
(Velasquez, Manuel, Clare Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J., Michael J. Meyer, "The Common Good," Issues in Ethics, Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University, California, Spring 1992)
Surely you remember that from your studies here at The University of Akron.
"More recently, the contemporary ethicist, John Rawls, defined the common good as ‘certain general conditions that are ...equally to everyone's advantage.'"
(Markkula Center, Ibid)
Yet, while it looks good on paper, this theory is not without detractors. We know that when dealing with human nature, what may be good for one may not be good for the whole. Beyond the will to survive, most everything else seems to be open for debate.
For example: "...even if we agreed upon what we all valued, we would certainly disagree about the relative values things have for us. While all may agree...that an affordable health system, a healthy educational system and a clean environment are all parts of the common good, some will say that more should be invested in health than in education, while others will favor directing resources to the environment over both health and education."That's the dilemma Congress wrestles with every day.
Indeed, "The Earth is one, but the world is not. We all depend on one biosphere for sustaining our lives. Yet each community, each country strives for survival and prosperity with little regard for its impact on others."
(World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, USA, May 21, 1987, P. 27)
That is the crux of the report, Our Common Future, prepared way back in 1987 by the World Commission on Environment and Development, headed by Gro Brundtland, who was then Prime Minister of Norway.
The independent body was set up by the United Nations to re-examine critical environmental issues, to develop proposals to solve them, and to ensure that human progress might enjoy "sustainable development" without bankrupting the resources of future generations.
(World Commission, Review, Ibid)
"Some consume the Earth's resources at a rate that would leave little for future generations," the report states. "Others, many more in number, consume far too little and live with the prospect of hunger, squalor, disease and early death."
(World Commission, Ibid)
"Societies have faced such pressures in the past and, as many desolate ruins remind us, sometimes succumbed to them. But generally these pressures were local. Today the scale of our interventions in nature is increasing and the physical effects of our decisions spill across national frontiers."
(World Commission, Ibid)
"Yet progress has been made. Throughout much of the world, children born today can expect to live longer and be better educated than their parents. In many parts, the newborn can also expect to attain a higher standard of living in a (much broader) sense. Such progress provides hope as we contemplate the improvements still needed, and also as we face our failures to make this earth a safer and sounder home for us and for those who are (yet) to come."
(World Commission, Ibid)
The common good is a form of "selfish altruism" a sort of knowledge that if we do good for others we will do well for ourselves.
In just a few moments, we will honor an individual who has been able to strike that balance throughout his career.
Howard L. Calhoun is an attorney, a civic leader and a former member of the University's Board of Trustees. Over the years, he has shared his energy and expertise with a range of organizations, from the Family Services Society of Summit County to the Ohio Wildlife Council and many more.
And while his hard work and dedication has made him an admired and respected community leader, he also has impacted your life at this University. Like other members of our Board of Trustees, Mr. Calhoun knows that the value of life is measured by the lives we touch.
Our Trustees receive no pay for their service, but there is certainly a payback in knowing that what they do to assist students helps the University and helps the community. What they do to help you succeed, affects the welfare of our entire society.
History has taught us that to improve our lot as a society, we must make use of our collective wisdom, and that we must make use of our accumulated and emerging knowledge.
Indeed, your educational experience at The University of Akron is an important part of that collective human investment.
Like the farmer and his seed corn, higher education provides the cross-pollination that is needed to improve our fortune, as well as that of our neighbors. We create a better future for ourselves and for our children by investing in those things that advance the common good.
And so, as you now open doors of opportunity and create your own experiences, you become part of that progressive and collective human advancement.
Treasure it, nurture it, and continue to learn. Our collective future and our common good depend on it.
Remarks Abstract:
"Seismic rumbles of change" are transforming traditional paradigms for research and higher education-to say nothing about the relationships between academia, industry, government and the public. The sources of cataclysmic pressure are many, including competition among universities, shifting demographics and their accompanying shifts in priorities, resource constraints, public/government scrutiny of productivity and accountability in universities, the evolution of a global economy and the innovation ecosystem, and, most recently, the worldwide economic downturn. Like many industries, higher education is on the threshold of major, complex changes that must be directed to optimal outcomes. The University of Akron is innovating through a continuous process that seeks to enhance its relevance, connectivity and productivity.
Relevance: Institutions of higher education generally are place-based, and this means that the competitive and comparative advantages of universities are inextricably linked to the vitality and sustainability of their surrounding communities. Thus, universities must act to optimize their impact upon the regions in which they reside, and would be wise to extend their efforts collaboratively into like regions internationally. The complexities of the 21st Century knowledge and conceptual economy require that every academic discipline be collaboratively engaged with the relevant questions of the day in concert with other disciplines and partners on and off campus. In other words, relevance requires the integrated application of all disciplinary knowledge for the public good.
Connectivity: Connectivity is an extension of relevance and refers to engagement with others by universities in the myriad forms represented by partnerships and collaboration that are not limited by institutional, sector, geographic or disciplinary boundaries. In other words, connectivity means relevant engagement among some combinations of other academic institutions, government, business and industry. This becomes essential as governments become a smaller and smaller financial partner, requiring universities increasingly to generate their own financial revenue opportunities.
Productivity: Finally, higher education must move from measuring "excellence" by exclusion and expense to a set of productivity-based metrics that reflect outcomes and achievements in solving "real-world" problems and in enabling student success.
Universities now are being called upon to explore opportunities that will create innovative educational processes and campus cultures congruent with new realities. This will require a close and deep collaboration between universities and other public- and private- sector organizations, along with a willingness to experiment with new models and new alliances. As we increasingly work with partners accustomed to aggressive delivery schedules and product mixes that rapidly change according to market demands, the core of academic processes will be challenged, and adaptability must become integrated into institutional culture.
As part of his 10th State of the University address, University of Akron President Luis M. Proenza promised to send this letter to the university community to ask that faculty, staff and students to "engage in timely and necessary conversations to bring... about (a mission- and vision-based university organizational structure). He said, "I am sure many lively and constructive ideas will be brought forward, but we must approach this with a sense of urgency because, as I have said before, doing business as usual is not an option."
University of Akron President Luis M. Proenza underscored the successes of the past year and set in motion the process of steering the university toward the future during his 10th State of the University Address. As promised during his 2008 address, Proenza provided a progress report on the formal 10-year strategic plan, which he said "will chart the course to our new destination." As he outlined these plans, Proenza encouraged the audience to think about the origin of the name "Akron," derived from the Greek "akros," meaning "high place," in setting and achieving those goals.
Proenza outlined five strategic goals that will guide the university through the next 10 years and beyond:
Proenza also said that, in addition to budget challenges, an increasingly competitive environment for higher education and universities can't continue to operate with an educational model that is more than 200-years-old. He said he believes that the university must try even harder to be to bring down academic silo walls and build connections--emphasizing UA's relevance, connectivity and productivity.