Professor Wang

Polymer Physics Group:

melt rheology and molecular mechanics of glassy and semicrystalline polymers

Shi-Qing Wang

Kumho Professor
Ph.D. (Physics), University of Chicago (1987)
Fellow of the American Physical Society (1997)
Fellow of American Association for the Advancement of Science (2014)
Member of American Physical Society, Society of Rheology



Available from WileyWiley Online Library

Available from Amazon


             Free at last

            Let long chains join the elastic network,

            And act together to preserve cohesion.

            Fight with the imposed strain till the end.

            Yielding only emerges

            When imbalance of forces occurs, truth unveiled.

            Polymers are free at last from chain entanglement.

            No tubes confine them further now.

Research Interests

Physics and engineering of polymeric and polymer-based materials. Phenomenological and conceptual foundations of polymer melt rheology and molecular mechanics of polymers in solid state, either glassy or semicrystalline or "both" (i.e., semicrystalline polymers below the glass transition temperature.  Exploration of the relationship between processing, structure and mechanical properties of all polymeric materials.

Current Activities

Our current research involve three episodes in the saga to develop a unified framework for mechanical characteristics of polymers in both liquid and solid states: rheology of polymeric liquids, mechanics of glassy polymers and responses of semicrystalline polymers under heavy loading.  Several hundred billion pounds of polymers are annually consumed to make commercial plastic (milk bottles) and rubber (e.g., auto tires) products for worldwide consumption.  Before they turn into their final forms, most are brought to their liquid states for processing.  After the processing, they typically solidify, becoming either glassy or semicrystalline.  Our understanding on rheological behavior of polymer liquids under large and rapid deformation, described in Nonlinear Polymer Rheology (Wiley, 2018), provides us valuable insights into when and how glassy and semicrystalline polymers gain or lose ductility in solid state.

Episode 3Brittle vs. ductile characteristics of semicrystalline polymers

Semicrystalline polymers can be conveniently classified into two groups depending on whether their glass transition temperature is above or below room temperature.  According to this classification, polymers such as polyethylene and polypropylene belongs to class A and polyesters such as PET and poly(lactic acid) belong to class B.  It is often noted that class B semicrystalline polymers are brittle (at room temperature) in presence of saturated crystallization while their counterparts, i.e., the same polymers in their amorphous glassy state can be ductile.  Our current efforts are directed to develop a basic molecular-level understanding of mechanical behavior of semicrystalline polymers so that tough semicrystalline polymers can be manufactured without invoking any chemical means.  To establish a realistic model for mechanics of semicrystalline polymers, it is indispensable for us to have a thorough understanding of the other two subjects listed below as 1. Nonlinear melt rheology and 2. Molecular mechanics of glassy polymers.  Our first manuscript in mechanics of semicrystalline polymers is currently under review in Macromolecules.

Episode 2: Molecular mechanics of glassy polymers

Recently we have come to realize how we should think about mechanical behavior of glassy polymers.  It has been a very difficult, outstanding challenge to gain some molecular level understanding of yielding and failure behavior of polymer glasses under large deformation.  For many polymer glasses with Tg well above room temperature, why are some brittle and others ductile?  If it is a matter of entanglement density, why do these polymers turn from ductile to brittle upon cooling to a lower temperature, and vice versa?  Ultimately, can we answer why polystyrene is the most brittle (typically still brittle at 80 ℃) and bisphenol A polycarbonate is most ductile (known to be ductile at -110 ℃) among all known polymer glasses?

It turns out that a crucial clue comes from the observation that all non-polymeric organic glasses are brittle.  There arises the natural question of why polymeric glasses can be ductile at all?  Being polymeric is the key.  We have formulated a molecular model [ J. Chem. Phys. 141, 094905 (2014)] for yielding, crazing and brittle-ductile transition.  In the zeroth-order picture, polymer glasses are structural hybrids, made of a primary structure due to short-ranged inter-segmental attractions (causing vitrification) and long-ranged chain networking that can be extended to allow buildup of chain tension, plausibly corresponding to bond length and angle deviations from the equilibrium values.  A polymer glass gains global plasticity and is ductile at a given temperature if its chain network can activate the glassy state globally.  Conversely, if the chain network breaks down before it "finishes its job", a polymer glass is going to undergo brittle fracture.  Here the chain network is envisioned in terms of junctions formed by at least two pairs of hairpins from different chains.

Episode 1: Nonlinear melt rheology

Many of these polymers, such as polyethylene and polybutadiene, are well entangled liquids above melting and glass transition temperatures. The research in the past decade has informed us that well entangled polymers, as highly viscoelastic liquids, behave as transient solids and undergo cohesive breakdown upon either startup deformation or large step strain or large amplitude oscillatory [Phys. Rev. Lett. 9601600119600197187801 (2006), 99237801 (2007), Macromol. Mater. Engr. 29215 (2007), J. Chem. Phys. 127,064903 (2007)].  The localized yielding phenomenon leads to strain localization such as shear banding and non-quiescent relaxation.  A new worldview has emerged, in which we have developed a unified treatment of deformation and flow in both shear and extension.  About sixty papers have been published on this subject in the past decade from our lab, and a list of these publications is provided here, including this manuscript that was rejected for publication on why EDT must exist regardless of any experimental difficulty, i.e., independent of any edge effects.

A one hour seminar is available at both YouTube and Youku, summarizing what we know now after six years of intense studies (between 2006 and 2012), which was given at the University of Akron on March 2, 2012.  Moreover, a recent publication discussed the construction as well as structure of the tube model and the emergence of an alternative conceptual framework.  To help us understand the difference between the new worldview and standard paradigm due to the tube model, we have made a short (9 min) presentation to highlight the need to address the issue of causality: a) where affine deformation comes from and b) when chain deformation ceases to increase.  

Much of the growing phenomenology has been recorded as video clips.  Our book of Nonlinear Polymer Rheology has an accompanying website where these videos can be accessed here.